Support Assistant

The official web site of A.H. Lloyd

[
[
[

]
]
]

Memo to US Bishops: criminals do criminal stuff

Back in February I pondered why the US Conference of Catholic Bishops had not put forth a model law to solve the immigration/migration problem.  Their statements are full of condemnation for a "broken system," but long ago I learned that if you don't have a solution, merely pointing out a problem is pointless.

It's gotten to the point where some bishops are offering dispensation to people on the basis that they are committing a criminal act and seeking to evade the legal consequences for their action.  Again, if American immigration law is on the same moral plane as chattel slavery, why don't the bishops speak clearly in favor of unlimited movement between countries?  This bizarre "don't change the law but don't enforce it" system perpetuates cruelty and facilitates human trafficking.

On a practical basis, much of this behavior can be explain by simple corruption: a lot of money was to be made in providing services to illegal migrants and that is now going away.  It must be painful to lay off workers and close down empty facilities because the government money spigot has been turned off.  There have been effort to encourage the laity to make up the shortfall, but these have (predictably) failed because of the obvious contradiction of asking for more donations to support migrants while also noting that there is a low-income housing shortage and the food banks are running low.

Like many Catholics, I'm taking a pass on the diocesan donation this year, and instead giving that money directly to my parish.

I think another factor in this is that the bishops have deluded themselves into the belief that a person who break one law, will not break any others.  This is an obvious fallacy: if you do one criminal act, you're likely to do others, perhaps as a result.  Criminality builds on itself.

No one crosses the border into another country by accident (unless you live in that weird stretch of US-Canadian border which crossing the street is an international event).  That's clearly not the case.  These people are committing an illegal act, albeit often with official sanction.

Still, every time the media wants to make a cause celeb out of one of these cases, we find out that they have a stack of driving citations, outstanding criminal warrants and so on.  I'm not the only one who has noticed that driving has gotten very dangerous over the last few years and that we are moving backwards in terms of automotive safety.  A large part of this are unlicensed drivers who don't speak the language and know that they will face no consequences because of their illegal status.

This is the rotten fruit of a poisoned tree.  Once people recognize that they are outside the law in one instance, it is expected that they flout other laws regarding safety, fraud, theft and so on.

This is why the Catholic Church is so shameful in its behavior.  One cannot hide behind "render unto Caesar" in cases like abortion while defying Caesar on immigration law.  I am unaware of any bishop marching on abortion clinics but plenty are happy to march for illegal immigration.

Again, if the law is unjust, tell the faithful what it should be.  Roll out a policy plan that tells us exactly how many new immigrants the US (or any other country) needs.  This must be backed up by scripture, Church doctrine and history.  

Otherwise, this just looks like the Catholic Church leadership is either clueless or dishonest.  

  1. CN Avatar
    CN

    I’ll vote for dishonest on this issue. Like Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the Church, both here and in Europe and Latin America, are receiving federal money to facilitate migration. The “faith based initiatives” became criminal aid societies under Obama, and Mayorkas exploited their greed. Naturally they receive no aid to protest abortion, but they were compensated for their support of illegals, and they want that compensation back. I have read local letters to the editor comparing the invasion by millions of migrants (here and in Europe) as comparable to the Flight into Egypt, but there are no Herods slaughtering military age Latino males, or Muslim males set on the conquest of Europe. I find the “not very Christian” comments by my stupid coreligionists to be very repulsive too, and I’m not afraid to say it to their faces. Claudia Scheinbaum might be a pain in the ass, but she’s not persecuting her people, nor are the governments of Honduras, Venezuela, Guatemala, El Salvador or the Muslim countries from which the men are coming.
    You know me, I attribute much of this to the WEF globalist plans and their likely need for foreign armies to smash local objectors. This was underscored for me when the Evil King Charles slammed Trump for criticizing the migrants flooding into the UK. Charles is a Schwab adherent, and now has William attending the meetings in his place to pretend that the monarchy is apolitical. I’d like to see the House of Windsor fall, or a less assholean member, perhaps Queen Anne, take his place and try him for treason.
    So far, I do not see the new Pope standing up to the migrants anywhere, and has not said, to the best of my knowledge, a damn thing against the killing of Christians or Druze in Syria. By the same token, no Jewish group I know of has stood up against migration here either, or has repented their anti-Trump hatred that prompted them to favor muslim migration to the US when Trump tried to shut down migration from hostile nations. There are a lot of religions that need to reexamine their stupidity on this issue, just as they need to reconsider the LGTBQ crap they supported and continue to champion.
    Hope you are well and that your mouth has healed.

    Like

  2. A.H. Lloyd Avatar
    A.H. Lloyd

    I would be happy to see the Windsor usurpers overthrown and replaced by the rightful, Catholic Stuart line (which will be ruling Liechtenstein shortly, in addition to being rulers-in-waiting of Bavaria).
    Pope Leo has been closely monitoring the situation in the Middle East, and regularly condemns attacks on Christians throughout the region, but the press rarely reports on this. American adventurism has been devastating to the ancient churches, many of whom are in communion with Rome. This has largely be ignored, and it one of the things that soured me our Excellent War on Terror.

    Like

  3. CN Avatar
    CN

    Who is covering his condemnation of these attacks? A Catholic neighbor is quite distressed and I’d like to pass on the site names.
    Possibly more devastating that American adventurism is the inexplicable (unless it’s financial” preference countries like the UK, France and Germany appear to have to the Islamist migrants. And where in the Muslim countries are muslim men being oppressed?
    Thanks

    Like

  4. A.H. Lloyd Avatar
    A.H. Lloyd

    I get a daily newsletter from aleteia.org. Not sure how I got on their list, but it is a pretty reliable source for what the pope is doing from day to day.
    As for Muslim migration into Europe, credit is where it is due. The US, under Obama, tried to overthrow Assad and succeeded in overthrowing Gaddafi, unleashing a tidal wave of migrants into Europe. The Europeans and the means to turn the back, but Mama Merkel said “we can do it,” and let the migrants rampage as they willed.
    So yes, the UK could stop migrants if it wanted, same with France, Germany, etc., but the US kicked that particular hornets’ nest over.

    Like

Leave a reply to A.H. Lloyd Cancel reply