I've spent a few days digesting the concept of Jewish Freemasons, which seems like nightmare fuel for a whole slate of groups.
Being of Jewish heritage myself, I take something of a jaded view of these things, but I can't help but wonder: why the Freemasons?
To put it another way, there were lots of mutual aid societies within the US in the 19th Century, and while the New Deal and demographic changes undercut their support, they remained a part of the cultural landscape for decades. There is a reason why the nostalgia-driven Happy Days had Howard Cunningham serve as a member of Leopard Lodge No. 462, eventually rising to the rank of "Grand Poobah."
I suppose I could do a deep dive into Freemasonry, but that way lies madness. A cursory survey indicates that Jews did in fact have to create their own "rite" of Freemasons, but why did they bother? Why not just make the Ancient and Honorable Order of David or some such thing? Was it branding? Did all fraternal societies need to be Masons?
Perhaps it was a question of social status. I'm descended of German Jews and it appears that my ancestors were extremely disdainful of Jews from Slavic lands. The easiest way to make someone want something is to preemptively deny it to them. If Jews are excluded from the ordinary Masonic rites, a predictable response is for them to create their own.
There's also the whole mystic Temple aspect. It had to be grating for Jews to see Christians (or Deists) claim descent from the builders of the Temple of Solomon.
On the other hand, Freemasonry comes with so much baggage that I'm at a loss as to why Jews would want to wade into the thicket of the Knights Templar and Baphomet and all of that.
The Leopard Lodge looks a lot more attractive.
Leave a reply to CN Cancel reply